SARCLISA is indicated:
- in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone, for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have received at least two prior therapies including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy.
- in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone, for the treatment of adult patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy (see section 5.1).
- SARCLISA in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, for the treatment of adult patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are not eligible for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT).

SARCLISA should be administered by a healthcare professional, in an environment where resuscitation facilities are available.
Premedication
Prevention of infusion reaction Premedication should be used prior to SARCLISA infusion with the following medicinal products to reduce the risk and severity of infusion reactions:
• Dexamethasone 40 mg oral or intravenous (or 20 mg oral or intravenous for patients ≥75 years of age): when administered in combination with isatuximab and pomalidomide,
Dexamethasone 20 mg (intravenous on the days of isatuximab and/or carfilzomib infusions, and oral on the other days): when administered in combination with isatuximab and carfilzomib.
• Acetaminophen 650 mg to 1000 mg oral (or equivalent).
• Diphenhydramine 25 mg to 50 mg intravenous or oral (or equivalent [e.g., cetirizine, promethazine, dexchlorpheniramine]). The intravenous route is preferred for at least the first 4 infusions.
The above recommended dose of dexamethasone (oral or intravenous) corresponds to the total dose to be administered only once before the infusion, as part of the premedication and the backbone treatment, before isatuximab and pomalidomide and before isatuximab and carfilzomib administration.
The recommended premedication agents should be administered 15-60 minutes prior to starting a SARCLISA infusion. Patients who do not experience an infusion reaction upon their first 4 administrations of SARCLISA may have their need for subsequent premedication reconsidered.
Management of neutropenia
The use of colony-stimulating factors (e.g. G-CSF) should be considered to mitigate the risk of neutropenia. In the event of grade 4 neutropenia, SARCLISA administration should be delayed until neutrophil count improves to at least 1.0 x 109/L (see section 4.4).
Prevention of infection
Antibacterial and antiviral prophylaxis (such as herpes zoster prophylaxis) can be considered during treatment (see section 4.4).
Posology
The recommended dose of SARCLISA is 10 mg/kg body weight administered as an intravenous infusion in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-Pd) or in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-Kd), or in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-VRd).
SARCLISA dosing schedules are provided in Tables 1 and 2:
Table 1: SARCLISA dosing schedule in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone or in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone
unacceptable toxicity.
For other medicinal products that are administered with SARCLISA, see section 5.1 and the respective current summary of product characteristics.
The administration schedule must be carefully followed. If a planned dose of SARCLISA is missed, administer the dose as soon as possible and adjust the treatment schedule accordingly, maintaining the treatment interval.
Dose adjustments
No dose reduction of SARCLISA is recommended.
Administration adjustments should be made if patients experience infusion reactions (see “Method of administration” below).
For other medicinal products that are administered with SARCLISA, the respective current summary of product characteristics should be considered.
Special populations
Elderly
Based on population pharmacokinetic analysis, no dose adjustment is recommended in elderly patients.
Patients with renal impairment Based on population pharmacokinetic analysis and on clinical data, no dose adjustment is recommended in patients with mild to severe renal impairment including end-stage renal disease (see section 5.2).
Patients with hepatic impairment Based on population pharmacokinetic analysis, no dose adjustment is recommended in patients with mild hepatic impairment. Data in patients with moderate and severe hepatic impairment are limited (see section 5.2), but there is no evidence to suggest that dose adjustment is required in these patients.
Paediatric population
The safety and efficacy of SARCLISA in children below 18 years of age have not been established. No data are available.
Method of administration
SARCLISA is for intravenous use. For instructions on dilution of the medicinal product before administration, see section 6.6.
Infusion rates
Following dilution, the SARCLISA infusion should be administered intravenously at the infusion rate presented in Table 3 below (see section 5.1). Incremental escalation of the infusion rate should be considered only in the absence of infusion reactions (see section 4.8).
Administration adjustments should be made if patients experience infusion reactions (see section 4.4)
• In patients necessitating an intervention (Grade 2, moderate infusion reactions), a temporary interruption in the infusion should be considered and additional symptomatic medicinal products can be administered. After symptom improvement to grade ≤1 (mild), SARCLISA infusion may be resumed at half of the initial infusion rate under close monitoring and supportive care, as needed. If symptoms do not recur after 30 minutes, the infusion rate may be increased to the initial rate, and then increased incrementally, as shown in Table 2.
• If symptoms do not resolve rapidly or do not improve to Grade ≤1 after interruption of SARCLISA infusion, persist or worsen despite appropriate medicinal products, or require hospitalization or are life-threatening, treatment with SARCLISA should be permanently discontinued and additional supportive therapy should be administered, as needed.

Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of its excipients listed in section 6.1.

Traceability
In order to improve the traceability of biological medicinal products, the name and the batch number of the administered product should be clearly recorded.
Infusion reactions
Infusion reactions, mostly mild or moderate, have been observed in 38.2% of patients treated with SARCLISA in ICARIA-MM, in 45.8% of patients treated with Isa-Kd in IKEMA, and in 24.0% of patients treated with Isa-VRd in IMROZ (see section 4.8). In ICARIA-MM, all infusion reactions started during the first SARCLISA infusion and resolved on the same day in 98% of the infusions. The most common symptoms of an infusion reaction included dyspnoea, cough, chills and nausea. The most common severe signs and symptoms included hypertension, dyspnoea, and bronchospasm. In IKEMA, the infusion reactions occurred on the infusion day in 99.2% of episodes. In patients treated with Isa-Kd, 94.4% of those experiencing an IR experienced it during the first cycle of treatment. All infusion reactions resolved. The most common symptoms of an infusion reaction included cough, dyspnoea, nasal congestion, vomiting and nausea. The most common severe signs and symptoms included hypertension and dyspnoea. In IMROZ, the IRs started on the infusion day in all patients, mostly during the first SARCLISA infusion, and resolved the same day in 97.3% of patients. All IRs resolved. The most common symptoms of an IR included dyspnoea and chills. The most common severe sign and symptom was hypertension. (see section 4.8).
However, serious infusion reactions including severe anaphylactic reactions have also been observed after SARCLISA administration (see section 4.8).
To decrease the risk and severity of infusion reactions, patients should be pre-medicated prior to SARCLISA infusion with acetaminophen, diphenhydramine or equivalent; dexamethasone is to be used as both premedication and anti-myeloma treatment (see section 4.2). Vital signs should be frequently monitored during the entire SARCLISA infusion. When required, interrupt SARCLISA infusion and provide appropriate medical and supportive measures (see section 4.2). In case symptoms do not improve to grade ≤1 after interruption of SARCLISA infusion, persist or worsen despite appropriate medicinal products, require hospitalization or are life-threatening, permanently discontinue SARCLISA and institute appropriate management.
Neutropenia In patients treated with Isa-Pd, neutropenia was reported as a laboratory abnormality in 96.1% of patients and as an adverse reaction (1) in 46.7% of patients, with Grade 3-4 neutropenia reported as a laboratory abnormality in 84.9% of patients and as an adverse reaction in 45.4% of patients. Neutropenic complications have been observed in 30.3% of patients, including 11.8% of febrile neutropenia and 25.0% of neutropenic infections. In patients treated with Isa-Kd, neutropenia was reported as a laboratory abnormality in 54.8% of patients and as an adverse reaction (1) in 4.5% of patients, with Grade 3-4 neutropenia reported as a laboratory abnormality in 19.2% of patients (with 17.5% Grade 3 and 1.7% Grade 4) and as an adverse reaction in 4.0% of patients. Neutropenic complications have been observed in 2.8% of patients, including 1.1% of febrile neutropenia and 1.7% of neutropenic infections. In patients treated with Isa-VRd, neutropenia was reported as a laboratory abnormality in 87.5% of patients and as an adverse reaction in 30% of patients, with Grade 3-4 neutropenia reported as a laboratory abnormality in 54.4% of patients (with 35.7% Grade 3 and 18.6% Grade 4) and as an adverse reaction in 30% of patients. Neutropenic complications have been observed in 12.5% of patients, including 2.3% of febrile neutropenia and 10.6% of neutropenic infection (see section 4.8).
Complete blood cell counts should be monitored periodically during treatment. Patients with neutropenia should be monitored for signs of infection. No dose reductions of SARCLISA are recommended. SARCLISA dose delays and the use of colony-stimulating factors (e.g. G-CSF) should be considered to mitigate the risk of neutropenia (see section 4.2).
(1) Haematology laboratory values were recorded as adverse reactions only if they led to treatment discontinuation and/or dose modification and/or fulfilled a serious criterion.
Infection
A higher incidence of infections, including grade ≥ 3 infections, mainly pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infection and bronchitis, occurred with SARCLISA (see section 4.8). Patients receiving SARCLISA should be closely monitored for signs of infection and appropriate standard therapy instituted.
Antibacterial and antiviral prophylaxis (such as herpes zoster prophylaxis) can be considered during treatment (see sections 4.2 and 4.8).
Second primary malignancies In ICARIA-MM, second primary malignancies (SPMs) were reported at a median follow-up time of 52.44 months in 10 patients (6.6%) treated with Isa-Pd and in 3 patients (2%) treated with Pd. SPM were skin cancer in 6 patients treated with Isa-Pd and in 3 patients treated with Pd, solid tumours other than skin cancer in 3 patients treated with Isa-Pd (one patient also had a skin cancer), and haematological malignancy (myelodysplastic syndrome) in 1 patient treated with Isa-Pd (see section 4.8). Patients continued treatment after resection of the new malignancy, except two patients treated with Isa-Pd. One patient developed metastatic melanoma and the other developed myelodysplastic syndrome. The overall benefit of Isa-Pd remains favourable (see section 5.1). In ongoing IKEMA study, at a median follow-up time of 20.73 months, SPMs were reported in 13 patients (7.3%) treated with Isa-Kd and in 6 patients (4.9%) treated with Kd. SPMs were skin cancers in 9 patients (5.1%) treated with Isa-Kd and in 3 patients (2.5%) treated with Kd, and were solid tumours other than skin cancer in 5 patients (2.8%) treated with Isa-Kd and in 4 patients (3.3%) treated with Kd. One patient (0.6%) in the Isa-Kd group and one patient (0.8%) in the Kd group had both skin cancer and solid tumours other than skin cancer (see section 4.8). Patients with skin cancer continued treatment after resection of the skin cancer. Solid tumours other than skin cancer were diagnosed within 3 months after treatment initiation in 3 patients (1.7%) treated with Isa-Kd and in 2 patients (1.6%) treated with Kd. In IMROZ study, at a median follow-up time of 59.73 months, SPMs were reported in 42 patients (16.0%) treated with Isa-VRd (0.041 events per patient-year) and in 16 patients (8.8%) treated with VRd (0.026 events per patient-year). SPMs were skin cancers in 22 patients (8.4%) treated with Isa-VRd and in 7 patients (3.9%) treated with VRd, were solid tumours other than skin cancer in 17 patients (6.5%) treated with Isa-VRd and in 7 patients (3.9%) treated with VRd, and haematological malignancy in 3 patients (1.1%) treated with Isa-VRd and in 2 patients (1.1%) treated with VRd. Patients with SPM of skin cancer continued treatment after resection of the skin cancer, except one patient in each treatment group. In patients with SPM of skin cancer, 6 patients (27.3%) treated with Isa-VRd and no patient treated with VRd had a medical history of skin cancer. In patients with SPM of solid tumours other than skin cancer, 2 patients (11.8%) treated with Isa-VRd and 1 patient (14.3%) treated with VRd had a medical history of cancer. Six patients (6, 2.3%) treated with Isa-VRd (4 with solid tumour other than skin cancer, 1 with skin cancer, and 1 with haematological malignancy) and 3 patients (1.7%) treated with VRd group (1 with solid tumour other than skin cancer, 1 with skin cancer, and 1 with haematological malignancy) discontinued treatment due to SPM. SPMs with fatal outcome were reported in 6 patients (2.3%) treated with Isa-VRd (neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin, malignant melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma of skin, squamous cell carcinoma of lung, colorectal cancer, and rectal adenocarcinoma) and in 2 patients (1.1%) treated with VRd (metastases to peritoneum and adenocarcinoma of colon). The overall benefit of Isa-VRd remains favourable (see section 5.1). The overall incidence of SPMs in all the SARCLISA-exposed patients is 6.0%. Physicians should carefully evaluate patients before and during treatment as per IMWG guidelines for occurrence of SPM and initiate treatment as indicated.
Tumour lysis syndrome
Cases of tumour lysis syndrome (TLS) have been reported in patients who received isatuximab. Patients should be monitored closely and appropriate precautions taken.
Interference with serological testing (indirect antiglobulin test) Isatuximab binds to CD38 on red blood cells (RBCs) and may result in a false positive indirect antiglobulin test (indirect Coombs test). This interference with the indirect Coombs test may persist for at least 6 months after the last infusion of SARCLISA. To avoid potential problems with RBC transfusion, patients being treated with SARCLISA should have blood type and screen tests performed prior to the first infusion. Phenotyping may be considered prior to starting SARCLISA treatment as per local practice. If treatment with SARCLISA has already started, the blood bank should be informed. Patients should be monitored for theoretical risk of haemolysis. If an emergency transfusion is required, non- cross- matched ABO/Rh-compatible RBCs can be given as per local blood bank practices (see section 4.5).
Interference with determination of complete response
Isatuximab is an IgG kappa monoclonal antibody that could be detected on both serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation (IFE) assays used for the clinical monitoring of endogenous M-protein (see section 4.5). This interference can impact the accuracy of the determination of complete response in some patients with IgG kappa myeloma protein. Twenty-two patients in the Isa-Pd arm who met Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) criteria with only residual immunofixation-positivity were tested for interference. Serum samples from these patients were tested by mass spectrometry to separate isatuximab signal from the myeloma M-protein signal. In the Isa-Kd arm, out of the 27 patients identified with potential interference and tested by mass spectrometry at the sensitivity level of the immunofixation test (25 mg/dL), 15 non-Complete Response (non-CR) patients as per Independent Response Committee (IRC) showed no detectable residual myeloma M-protein. Among these 15 patients, 11 patients had plasma cell <5% in bone marrow. This indicates that 11 additional patients out of the 179 Isa-Kd patients (6.1%) could have CR as best response leading to a potential CR rate of 45.8% (see section 4.5).
Elderly
Data are limited in the elderly population ≥ 85 years old (see section 4.2).

Isatuximab has no impact on the pharmacokinetics of pomalidomide, or carfilzomib, or bortezomib, or lenalidomide, or vice versa.
Interference with serological testing Because CD38 protein is expressed on the surface of red blood cells, isatuximab, an anti-CD38 antibody, may interfere with blood bank serologic tests with potential false positive reactions in indirect antiglobulin tests (indirect Coombs tests), antibody detection (screening) tests, antibody identification panels, and antihuman globulin (AHG) crossmatches in patients treated with isatuximab (see section 4.4). The interference mitigation methods include treating reagent RBCs with dithiothreitol (DTT) to disrupt isatuximab binding or other locally validated methods. Since the Kell Blood group system is also sensitive to DTT treatment, Kell-negative units should be supplied after ruling out or identifying alloantibodies using DTT-treated RBCs.
Interference with Serum Protein Electrophoresis and Immunofixation Tests Isatuximab may be detected on serum protein electrophoresis (SPE) and immunofixation (IFE) assays used for monitoring disease monoclonal immunoglobulins (M-protein) and could interfere with accurate response classification based on International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria (see section 4.4). In patients with persistent very good partial response, where isatuximab interference is suspected, consider using a validated isatuximab-specific IFE assay to distinguish isatuximab from any remaining endogenous M protein in the patient’s serum, to facilitate determination of a complete response.

Women of childbearing potential/Contraception
Women of childbearing potential treated with isatuximab should use effective contraception during treatment and for 5 months after cessation of treatment.
Pregnancy
There are no available data on isatuximab use in pregnant women. Animal reproduction toxicity studies have not been conducted with isatuximab. Immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibodies are known to cross the placenta after the first trimester of pregnancy. The use of isatuximab in pregnant women is not recommended.
Breast-feeding
It is unknown whether isatuximab is excreted in human milk. Human IgGs are known to be excreted in breast milk during the first few days after birth, which is decreasing to low concentrations soon afterwards; however, a risk to the breast-fed child cannot be excluded during this short period just after birth. For this specific period, a decision must be made whether to discontinue breast-feeding or to discontinue/abstain from isatuximab therapy taking into account the benefit of breast-feeding for the child and the benefit of therapy for the woman. Afterwards, isatuximab could be used during breast-feeding if clinically needed.
Fertility No human and animal data are available to determine potential effects of isatuximab on fertility in males and females (see section 5.3).
For other medicinal products that are administered with isatuximab, refer to the respective current summary of product characteristics.

SARCLISA has no or negligible influence on the ability to drive and use machines. Fatigue and dizziness have been reported in patients taking SARCLISA and this should be taken into account when driving or using machines. For other medicinal products that are administered with SARCLISA, refer to the respective current summary of product characteristics.

Summary of the safety profile
In ICARIA-MM, the most frequent adverse reactions (>20%) are neutropenia (46.7%), infusion reactions (38.2%), pneumonia (30.9%), upper respiratory tract infection (28.3%), diarrhoea (25.7%) and bronchitis (23.7%). Serious adverse reactions occurred in 61.8% of patients receiving Isa-Pd. The most frequent serious adverse reactions are pneumonia (25.7%) and febrile neutropenia (6.6%). Permanent discontinuation of treatment because of adverse reactions was reported in 7.2% of patients treated with Isa-Pd. Adverse reactions with a fatal outcome during treatment were reported in 7.9% of patients treated with Isa-Pd (those occurring in more than 1% of patients were pneumonia occurring in 1.3% of patients and other infections occurring in 2.0% of patients).
In IKEMA, the most frequent adverse reactions (≥20%) are infusion reactions (45.8%), hypertension (36.7%), diarrhoea (36.2%), upper respiratory tract infection (36.2%), pneumonia (28.8%), fatigue (28.2%), dyspnoea (27.7%), insomnia (23.7%), bronchitis (22.6%), and back pain (22.0%). Serious adverse reactions occurred in 59.3% of patients receiving Isa-Kd. The most frequent serious adverse reaction is pneumonia (21.5%). Permanent discontinuation of treatment because of adverse reactions was reported in 8.5% of patients treated with Isa-Kd. Adverse reactions with a fatal outcome during treatment were reported in 3.4% of patients treated with Isa-Kd (those occurring in more than 1% of patients were pneumonia and cardiac failure both occurring in 1.1% of patients).
In IMROZ, the most frequent adverse reactions (≥20%) are diarrhoea (54.8%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (54.4%), pneumonia (39.9%), cataract (38.0%), constipation (35.7%), fatigue (34.6%), upper respiratory tract infections (34.2%), oedema peripheral (32.7%), neutropenia (30.0% as an adverse reaction), infusion reaction (23.6%), insomnia (22.4%), Covid-19 (22.4%), back pain (22.1%), bronchitis (22.1%). and asthenia (21.7%), Serious adverse reactions occurred in 70.7% of patients receiving Isa-VRd. The most frequent serious adverse reaction was pneumonia (29.7%, including Covid-19 pneumonia). Adverse reactions with a fatal outcome during treatment (Grade 5 TEAEs) were reported in 11% of patients with Isa-VRd (those occurring in more than 1% of patients, based on preferred terms, were Covid-19 pneumonia occurring in 3.0% of patients and pneumonia occurring in 1.5% of patients). The overall incidence of death in both treatment period and post-treatment period was 26.0% in the Isa-VRd group and 32.6% in the VRd group. The difference in incidences is mainly driven by a difference in the incidence of death due to myeloma progression (4.9% in Isa-VRd group and 12.2% in the VRd group). Permanent discontinuation of treatment because of adverse reactions was reported in 22.8% of patients treated with Isa-VRd.
Tabulated list of adverse reactions
Adverse reactions are described using the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria, the COSTART and the MedDRA terms. Frequencies are defined as: very common (≥ 1/10), common (≥ 1/100 to < 1/10); uncommon (≥ 1/1,000 to < 1/100); rare (≥ 1/10,000 to < 1/1,000); very rare (< 1/10,000); “frequency not known (cannot be estimated from available data)”. Within each frequency grouping, adverse reactions are presented in the order of decreasing seriousness.
The adverse reactions were reported from the 152 patients who received Isa-Pd with a median duration of exposure of 41 weeks in ICARIA-MM study (see section 5.1).
a Only TEAEs are reported in Table 3. The haematology laboratory values are reported in Table 5.
b Cut-off date of 11-Oct-2018. Median follow-up time=11.60 months.
c The term pneumonia is a grouping of the following terms: atypical pneumonia, bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, pneumonia, pneumonia haemophilus, pneumonia influenzal, pneumonia pneumococcal, pneumonia streptococcal, pneumonia viral, pneumonia bacterial, haemophilus infection, lung infection, pneumonia fungal and pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia.
d See “Description of selected adverse reactions”.
e Cut-off date of 14-Mar-2022. Median follow-up time=52.44 months. Based on second primary malignancies reported during study treatment period and during post-treatment period.
f Haematology laboratory values were recorded as TEAEs only if they led to treatment discontinuation and/or dose modification or fulfilled a serious criterion.
g Based on multiple myeloma clinical trials.
*No grade 4
The adverse reactions were reported from the 177 patients who received Isa-Kd with a median duration of exposure of 80.0 weeks in IKEMA study (see section 5.1).
Table 5a: Adverse reactions reported in patients with multiple myeloma treated with isatuximab in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (IKEMA)
The adverse reactions were reported from the 263 patients who received Isa-VRd with a median duration of exposure of 231.14 weeks (53.2 months) in IMROZ study and from 73 patients who received Isa-VRd with a median duration of exposure of approximately 159 weeks and 114.93 weeks in TCD13983 Part A and Part B study, respectively (see section 5.1).
Table 6: Adverse reactions reported in patients with multiple myeloma treated with isatuximab in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (IMROZ and TCD13983)
the VRd group (31.3 months), TEAE incidence was assessed based on duration of exposure. The exposure-adjusted rate for Grade ≥3 TEAEs was 1.171 and 0.986 events per patient-year in the Isa-VRd and VRd groups, respectively, 0.031 and 0.019 for Grade 5 TEAEs, 0.375 and 0.435 for treatment-emergent serious adverse events, and 0.066 and 0.090 for TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation, respectively.
Table 7: Exposure-Adjusted Rates for Adverse Reactions Reported in Patients with multiple myeloma treated with isatuximab in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone - Patient years analysis (IMROZ)
Description of selected adverse reactions
Infusion reactions
In ICARIA-MM, infusion reactions were reported in 58 patients (38.2%) treated with SARCLISA. All patients who experienced infusion reactions, experienced them during the 1st infusion of SARCLISA, with 3 patients (2.0%) also having infusion reactions at their 2nd infusion, and 2 patients (1.3%) at their 4th infusion. Grade 1 infusion reactions were reported in 3.9%, Grade 2 in 31.6%, Grade 3 in 1.3%, and Grade 4 in 1.3% of the patients. All infusion reactions were reversible and resolved the same day in 98% of the infusions. Signs and symptoms of Grade 3 or 4 infusion reactions included dyspnoea, hypertension, and bronchospasm. The incidence of infusion interruptions because of infusion reactions was 28.9%. The median time to infusion interruption was 55 minutes.
Discontinuations from treatment due to infusion reaction were reported in 2.6% of patients in Isa-Pd group.
In IKEMA, infusion reactions were reported in 81 patients (45.8%) treated with Isa-Kd. Grade 1 infusion reactions were reported in 13.6%, Grade 2 in 31.6%, and Grade 3 in 0.6% of the patients treated with Isa-Kd. All infusion reactions were reversible and resolved the same day in 73.8% of episodes in Isa-Kd patients and in more than 2 days in 2.5% of episodes in Isa-Kd patients. Signs and symptoms of Grade 3 infusion reactions included dyspnoea and hypertension. The incidence of patients with isatuximab infusion interruptions because of infusion reactions was 29.9%. The median time to isatuximab infusion interruption was 63 minutes. Isatuximab was discontinued in 0.6% of patients due to infusion reactions.
In IMROZ, infusion reactions were reported in 63 patients (24.0%) treated with Isa-VRd. Grade 1 IRs were reported in 1.9%, Grade 2 in 21.3%, Grade 3 in 0.4%, and Grade 4 in 0.4% of the patients treated with Isa-VRd. No Grade 5 infusion reactions were reported. The IRs started on the infusion day in all patients, mostly during the first SARCLISA infusion, and resolved the same day in 97.3% of patients. All IRs resolved. Signs and symptoms of Grade 3 or 4 IRs included hypertension, bronchospasm, and hypoxia. The incidence of patients with isatuximab infusion interruptions because of infusion reactions was 20.9%. The median time to isatuximab infusion interruption was 66.0 minutes. Isatuximab was discontinued in 0.8% of patients due to infusion reactions. (see sections 4.2 and 4.4).
Infections
In ICARIA-MM, the incidence of Grade 3 or higher infections was 42.8%. Pneumonia was the most commonly reported severe infection with Grade 3 reported in 21.7% of patients in the Isa-Pd group compared to 16.1% in the Pd group, and Grade 4 in 3.3% of patients in the Isa-Pd group compared to 2.7% in the Pd group. Discontinuations from treatment due to infection were reported in 2.6% of patients in the Isa-Pd group compared to 5.4% in the Pd group. Fatal infections were reported in 3.3% of patients in the Isa-Pd group and 4.0% in the Pd group. In IKEMA, the incidence of Grade 3 or higher infections was 38.4%. Pneumonia was the most commonly reported severe infection with Grade 3 reported in 15.8% of patients in the Isa-Kd group compared to 10.7% in the Kd group, and Grade 4 in 3.4% of patients in the Isa-Kd group compared to 2.5% in the Kd group. Treatment was discontinued due to infection in 2.8% of patients in the Isa-Kd group compared to 4.9% in the Kd group. Fatal infections were reported in 2.3% of patients in the Isa-Kd group and 0.8% in the Kd group. In IMROZ, the incidence of Grade 3 or higher infections was 44.9% in the Isa-VRd group and 38.1% in the VRd group (0.174 versus 0.171 event rate per patient year, respectively). Pneumonia was the most commonly reported severe infection with Grade 3 reported in 25.1% of patients in the Isa-VRd group compared to 15.5% in the VRd group, Grade 4 in 2.3% of patients in the Isa-VRd group compared to 3.9% in the VRd group. Grade 5 pneumonia, based on preferred term, occurred in 1.5% of patients in the Isa-VRd group compared to 1.1% in the VRd group. Discontinuations from treatment due to infection were reported in 8.4% of patients in the Isa-VRd group compared to 9.4% in the VRd group. Fatal infections were reported in 6.5% of patients in the Isa-VRd group and 4.4% in the VRd group. (see section 4.4).
In relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma clinical trials, herpes zoster was reported in 2.0% of patients. In ICARIA-MM, the incidence of herpes zoster was 4.6% in the Isa-Pd group compared to 0.7% in the Pd group, and in IKEMA, incidence was 2.3% in the Isa-Kd group compared to 1.6% in the Kd group. In newly diagnosed multiple myeloma clinical trials, herpes zoster was reported in 3.3% of patients. In IMROZ, the incidence of herpes zoster was 5.7% in the Isa-VRd group compared to 5.5% in the VRd group.
Cardiac failure
In IKEMA, cardiac failure (including cardiac failure, cardiac failure congestive, cardiac failure acute, cardiac failure chronic, left ventricular failure, and pulmonary oedema) was reported in 7.3% of patients with the Isa-Kd group (4.0% of Grade ≥3) and in 6.6% of patients with the Kd group (4.1% of Grade ≥3). Serious cardiac failure was observed in 4.0% of patients in the Isa-Kd group and in 3.3% of patients in the Kd group. Cardiac failure with a fatal outcome during treatment was reported in 1.1% of patients in the Isa-Kd group and not reported in the Kd group (see the current prescribing information for carfilzomib).
Haematology laboratory values
Table 8: Haematology laboratory abnormalities in patients receiving isatuximab combined with pomalidomide and dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and dexamethasone (ICARIA-MM)
Table 11: Haematology laboratory abnormalities in patients receiving isatuximab combined with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (TCD13983 Study, pooled Part A and B)
The denominator used for the percentage calculation is the number of patients with at least 1 evaluation of the laboratory test during the considered observation period.
Elderly patients
Of the total number of patients in clinical studies of SARCLISA, 57.3% (1024 patients) were 65 and over, while 14.1% (252 patients) were 75 and over. Differences in safety were observed between patients of 65 and over and younger patients. Grade >3 TEAEs was reported in 64.6% of patients less than 65 and in 78.8% of patients 65 and above, Grade 5 TEAEs was reported in 5.5% of patients less than 65 and in 8.7% of patients 65 and above; serious TEAEs were reported in 46.7% of patients of less than 65 and in 59.3% of patients 65 and above, TEAEs leading to definitive treatment discontinuation were reported in 6.0% of patients less than 65 and in 14.4% of patients 65 and over.
Immunogenicity
Across 9 clinical studies in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with isatuximab single agent and combination therapies including ICARIA-MM and IKEMA (N=1023), the incidence of treatment emergent anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) was <2%. No effect of ADAs was observed on pharmacokinetics, safety or efficacy of isatuximab. Across 3 clinical studies in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) with isatuximab in combination therapy with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, including IMROZ, ADA incidence ranged from 8.7% to 21.6%. In IMROZ, out of the 263 patients with NDMM treated with isatuximab in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, 253 were evaluable for the presence of ADA, 22 patients (8.7%) tested positive for treatment-emergent ADAs, with 21 patients considered to have a transient ADA response and 1 considered to have an indeterminate ADA response. Among these 22 ADA-positive patients, 13 (5.9%) had neutralizing antibodies. In IMROZ, a trend to lower exposure was observed in ADA-positive patients, which was considered not clinically relevant since, in patients with ADA-positive status to isatuximab including those with neutralizing antibodies, no meaningful impact of ADAs on safety or efficacy of isatuximab was observed.
Reporting of suspected adverse reactions
To report any side effect(s):
• Saudi Arabia:
- The National Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety Centre (NPC)
• SFDA call center : 19999
• E-mail: npc.drug@sfda.gov.sa
• Website: https://ade.sfda.gov.sa/
• Sanofi- Pharmacovigilance: KSA_Pharmacovigilance@sanofi.com

Signs and symptoms
There has been no experience of overdosage of isatuximab in clinical studies. Doses of intravenous isatuximab up to 20 mg/kg have been administered in clinical studies.
Management
There is no known specific antidote for SARCLISA overdose. In the event of overdose, monitor the patients for signs or symptoms of adverse reactions and take all appropriate measures immediately.

Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antineoplastic agents, monoclonal antibodies, ATC code: L01FC02.
Mechanism of action
Isatuximab is an IgG1-derived monoclonal antibody that binds to a specific extracellular epitope of CD38 receptor. CD38 is a transmembrane glycoprotein that is highly expressed on multiple myeloma cells.
In vitro, isatuximab acts through IgG Fc-dependent mechanisms including: antibody dependent cell mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), antibody dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP), and complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). Furthermore, isatuximab can also trigger tumour cell death by induction of apoptosis via an Fc-independent mechanism.
In vitro, isatuximab blocks the enzymatic activity of CD38 which catalyses the synthesis and hydrolysis of cyclic ADP-ribose (cADPR), a calcium mobilizing agent. Isatuximab inhibits the cADPR production from extracellular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) in multiple myeloma cells.
In vitro, isatuximab can activate NK cells in the absence of CD38 positive target tumour cells.
In vivo, a decrease in absolute counts of total CD16+ and CD56+ NK cells, CD19+ B-cells, CD4+ T-cells and TREG (CD3+, CD4+, CD25+, CD127-) was observed in peripheral blood of patients treated with isatuximab monotherapy.
In multiple myeloma patients, SARCLISA monotherapy induced clonal expansion of the T-cell receptor repertoire indicating an adaptive immune response.
The combination of isatuximab and pomalidomide in vitro enhances cell lysis of CD38 expressing multiple myeloma cells by effector cells (ADCC), and by direct tumour cell killing compared to that of isatuximab alone. In vivo animal experiments using a human multiple myeloma xenograft model in mice demonstrated that the combination of isatuximab and pomalidomide results in enhanced antitumour activity compared to the activity of isatuximab or pomalidomide alone.
Clinical efficacy and safety
Relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma
ICARIA-MM (EFC14335)
The efficacy and safety of SARCLISA in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone were evaluated in ICARIA-MM (EFC14335), a multicentre, multinational, randomised, open-label, 2-arm, phase III study in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Patients had received at least two prior therapies including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor with disease progression on or within 60 days after the end of the previous therapy. Patients with primary refractory disease were excluded.
A total of 307 patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either SARCLISA in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Isa-Pd, 154 patients) or pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd, 153 patients). Treatment was administered in both groups in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. SARCLISA 10 mg/kg was administered as an I.V. infusion weekly in the first cycle and every two weeks thereafter. Pomalidomide 4 mg was taken orally once daily from day 1 to day 21 of each 28-day cycle. Dexamethasone (oral/intravenous) 40 mg (20 mg for patients ≥75 years of age) was given on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 for each 28-day cycle.
Overall, demographic and disease characteristics at baseline were similar between the two treatment groups, with some minor imbalances. The median patient age was 67 years (range 36-86), 19.9% of patients were ≥75 years. ECOG PS was 0 in 35.7% of patients in the isatuximab arm and 45.1% in the comparator arm, 1 in 53.9% in the isatuximab arm and 44.4% in the comparator arm, and 2 in 10.4% in the isatuximab arm and 10.5% in the comparator arm, 10.4% of patients in the isatuximab arm versus 10.5% in the comparator arm entered the study with a history of COPD or asthma, and 38.6% versus 33.3% of patients with renal impairment (creatinine clearance <60 mL/min/1.73 m²) were included in the isatuximab arm versus the comparator arm , respectively. The International Staging System (ISS) stage at study entry was I in 37.5% (41.6% in the isatuximab arm and 33.3% in the comparator arm), II in 35.5% (34.4% in the isatuximab arm and 36.6% in the comparator arm) and III in 25.1% (22.1% in the isatuximab arm and 28.1% in the comparator arm) of patients. Overall, 19.5% of patients (15.6% in the isatuximab arm and 23.5% in the comparator arm) had high-risk chromosomal abnormalities at study entry; del(17p), t(4;14) and t(14;16) were present in 12.1% (9.1% in the isatuximab arm and 15.0% in the comparator arm), 8.5% (7.8% in the isatuximab arm and 9.2% in the comparator arm) and 1.6% (0.6% in the isatuximab arm and 2.6% in the comparator arm) of patients, respectively.
The median number of prior lines of therapy was 3 (range 2-11). All patients received a prior proteasome inhibitor, all patients received prior lenalidomide, and 56.4% of patients received prior stem cell transplantation. The majority of patients (92.5%) were refractory to lenalidomide, 75.9% to a proteasome inhibitor, and 72.6% to both an immunomodulatory and a proteasome inhibitor, and 59% of patients were refractory to lenalidomide at last line of therapy.
The median duration of treatment was 41.0 weeks for the Isa-Pd group compared to 24.0 weeks for the Pd group.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary efficacy endpoint of ICARIA-MM. The improvement in PFS represented a 40.4% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in patients treated with Isa-Pd.
Efficacy results are presented in Table 12 and Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS and OS are provided in Figures 1 and 2: 
a PFS results were assessed by an Independent Response Committee based on central laboratory data for M-protein and central radiologic imaging review using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.
b Patients without progressive disease or death before the analysis cut-off or the date of initiation of further anti-myeloma treatment were censored at the date of the last valid disease assessment not showing disease progression performed prior to initiation of a further anti-myeloma treatment (if any) or the analysis cut-off date, whichever came first.
c Stratified on age (<75 years versus >75 years) and number of previous lines of therapy (2 or 3 versus >3) according to IRT.
d sCR, CR, VGPR and PR were evaluated by the IRC using the IMWG response criteria. e Estimated using Clopper-Pearson method.|
f The duration of response was determined for patients who achieved a response of ≥PR (93 patients in the isatuximab arm and 54 patients in the comparator arm). Kaplan-Meier estimates of duration of response.
g CI for Kaplan-Meier estimates are calculated with log-log transformation of survival function and methods of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
*Cut-off date of 11-Oct-2018. Median follow-up time=11.60 months. HR<1 favours Isa-Pd arm.
NR: not reached
In patients with high-risk cytogenetics (central laboratory assessment), median PFS was 7.49 (95% CI: 2.628 to NC) in the Isa-Pd group and 3.745 (95% CI: 2.793 to 7.885) in the Pd group (HR=0.655; 95% CI: 0.334 to 1.283). PFS improvements in the Isa-Pd group were also observed in patients >75 years (HR=0.479; 95% CI: 0.242 to 0.946), with ISS stage III at study entry (HR=0.635; 95% CI: 0.363 to 1.110), with baseline creatinine clearance < 60 ml/min/1.73 m² (HR=0.502; 95% CI: 0.297 to 0.847), with > 3 prior lines of therapy (HR=0.590; 95% CI: 0.356 to 0.977), in patients refractory to prior therapy with lenalidomide (HR=0.593; 95% CI: 0.431 to 0.816) or proteasome inhibitor (HR=0.578; 95% CI: 0.405 to 0.824) and in those refractory to lenalidomide at the last line before to the study entry (HR= 0.601; 95%CI: 0.436 to 0.828).
Insufficient data is available to conclude on the efficacy of Isa-Pd in patients previously treated with daratumumab (1 patient in the isatuximab arm and no patient in the comparator arm).
The median time to first response in responders was 35 days in the Isa-Pd group versus 58 days in the Pd group. At a median follow-up time of 52.44 months, final median overall survival was 24.57 months in the Isa-Pd group and 17.71 months in the Pd group (HR=0.776; 95% CI: 0.594 to 1.015).
Cut-off date = 11 October 2018
In the ICARIA-MM (EFC14335) study, a weight-based volume was used for isatuximab infusion. The fixed volume infusion method as described in section 4.2 was evaluated in study TCD14079 Part B and pharmacokinetics simulations confirmed minimal differences between the pharmacokinetics following injection applying a volume based on patient weight and a fixed volume of 250 mL (see section 5.2). In study TCD14079 part B, there were no new safety signals or differences in efficacy and safety as compared to ICARIA-MM.
IKEMA (EFC15246)
The efficacy and safety of SARCLISA in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone were evaluated in IKEMA (EFC15246), a multicentre, multinational, randomized, open-label, 2-arm, phase III study in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Patients had received one to three prior therapies. Patients with primary refractory disease, who had previously been treated with carfilzomib, or who were refractory to previous anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody treatment were excluded.
A total of 302 patients were randomized in a 3:2 ratio to receive either SARCLISA in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-Kd, 179 patients) or carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd, 123 patients). Treatment was administered in both groups in 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. SARCLISA 10 mg/kg was administered as an I.V. infusion weekly in the first cycle and every two weeks thereafter. Carfilzomib was administered as an I.V. infusion at the dose of 20 mg/m² on days 1 and 2; 56 mg/m² on days 8, 9, 15 and 16 of cycle 1; and at the dose of 56 mg/m² on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15 and 16 for subsequent cycles of each 28-day cycle. Dexamethasone (IV on the days of isatuximab and/ or carfilzomib infusions, and PO on the other days) 20 mg was given on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22 and 23 for each 28-day cycle.
Overall, demographic and disease characteristics at baseline were similar between the two treatment groups. The median patient age was 64 years (range 33-90), 8.9% of patients were ≥75 years. ECOG PS was 0 in 53.1% of patients in the Isa-Kd group and 59.3% in the Kd group, 1 in 40.8% in the Isa-Kd group and 36.6% in the Kd group, and 2 in 5.6% in the Isa-Kd group and 4.1% in the Kd group, and 3 in 0.6% in the Isa-Kd group and 0% in the Kd group. The proportion of patients with renal impairment (eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2) was 24.0% in the Isa-Kd group versus 14.6% in the Kd group. The International Staging System (ISS) stage at study entry was I in 53.0%, II in 31.1%, and III in 15.2% of patients. The Revised-ISS (R-ISS) stage at study entry was I in 25.8%, II in 59.6%, and III in 7.9% of patients. Overall, 24.2% of patients had high -risk chromosomal abnormalities at study entry; del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16) were present in 11.3%, 13.9% and 2.0% of patients, respectively. In addition, gain(1q21) was present in 42.1% of patients.
The median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (range 1-4) with 44.4% of patients who received 1 prior line of therapy. Overall, 89.7% of patients received prior proteasome inhibitors, 78.1% received prior immunomodulators (including 43.4% who received prior lenalidomide), and 61.3 % received prior stem cell transplantation. Overall, 33.1% of patients were refractory to prior proteasome inhibitors, 45.0% were refractory to prior immunomodulators (including 32.8% refractory to lenalidomide), and 20.5% were refractory to both a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulator.
The median duration of treatment was 80.0 weeks for the Isa-Kd group compared to 61.4 weeks for the Kd group.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary efficacy endpoint of IKEMA. With a median follow-up time of 20.73 months, the primary analysis of PFS showed a statistically significant improvement in PFS represented by a 46.9% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in patients treated with Isa-Kd compared to patients treated with Kd.
Efficacy results are presented in Table 13 and Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS are provided in the Figure 3:
criteria.
b Stratified on number of previous lines of therapy (1 versus >1) and R-ISS (I or II versus III versus not classified) according to IRT.
c sCR, CR, VGPR, and PR were evaluated by the IRC using the IMWG response criteria.
d Estimated using Clopper-Pearson method.
e Nominal p-value.
f CR to be tested with final analysis.
g Based on a sensitivity level of 10-5 by NGS in ITT population.
h Based on Responders in the ITT population. Kaplan-Meier estimates of duration of response.
i CI for Kaplan-Meier estimates are calculated with log-log transformation of survival function and methods of Brookmeyer and Crowley.
* Cut-off date of 7 February 2020. Median follow-up time=20.73 months. HR<1 favours Isa-Kd arm.
NR: not reached.
PFS improvements in the Isa-Kd group were observed in patients with high -risk cytogenetics (central laboratory assessment, HR = 0.724; 95% CI: 0.361 to 1.451), with gain (1q21) chromosomal abnormality (HR=0.569; 95% CI: 0.330 to 0.981), ≥65 years (HR =0.429; 95% CI: 0.248 to 0.742), with baseline eGFR (MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (HR =0.273; 95% CI: 0.113 to 0.660), with >1 prior line of therapy (HR =0.479; 95% CI: 0.294 to 0.778), with ISS stage III at study entry (HR=0.650; 95% CI: 0.295 to 1.434), and in patients refractory to prior therapy with lenalidomide (HR=0.598; 95% CI: 0.339 to 1.055).
In the sensitivity analysis without censoring for further anti-myeloma therapy, the median PFS was not reached (NR) in the Isa-Kd group versus 19.0 months (95% CI: 15.38 to NR) in the Kd group (HR=0.572; 99% CI: 0.354 to 0.925, p=0.0025). Insufficient data is available to conclude on the efficacy of Isa-Kd in patients previously treated with daratumumab (1 patient in the isatuximab arm and no patient in the comparator arm).
The median time to first response was 1.08 months in the Isa-Kd group and 1.12 months in the Kd group. With a median follow-up time of 20.73 months, 17.3% patients in the Isa-Kd arm and 20.3% patients in the Kd arm had died.
Figure 3 – Kaplan-Meier Curves of PFS – ITT population – IKEMA (assessment by the IRC)
Cut-off date = 07 February 2020.
Among patients with eGFR (MDRD) <50 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline, complete renal response (≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at ≥1 postbaseline assessment) was observed for 52.0% (13/25) of patients in the Isa-Kd group and 30.8% (4/13) in the Kd group. Sustained complete renal response (≥60 days) occurred in 32.0% (8/25) of patients in the Isa-Kd group and in 7.7% (1/13) in the Kd group. In the 4 patients in the Isa-Kd group and the 3 patients in the Kd group with severe renal impairment at baseline (eGFR (MDRD) >15 to <30 mL/min/1.73 m2), minimal renal response (≥30 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at ≥1 postbaseline assessment) was observed for 100% of patients in the Isa-Kd group and 33.3% of patients in the Kd group.
At a median follow-up time of 43.96 months, final PFS analysis showed a median PFS of 35.65 months for Isa-Kd group compared to 19.15 months for Kd group, with a hazard ratio of 0.576 (95.4% CI: 0.418 to 0.792). Final complete response, determined using a validated isatuximab-specific IFE assay (Sebia Hydrashift) (see section 4.5), was 44.1% in Isa-Kd group compared to 28.5% in Kd group, with odds ratio 2.094 (95% CI: 1.259 to 3.482, descriptive p=0.0021). In 26.3% of patients in Isa-Kd group, both MRD negativity and CR were met compared to 12.2% in Kd group, with odds ratio 2.571 (95% CI: 1.354 to 4.882, descriptive p=0.0015).
Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
IMROZ (EFC12522)
The efficacy and safety of SARCLISA in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone were evaluated in IMROZ (EFC12522), a multicentre, international, randomized, open-label, 2-arm, phase III study in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are not eligible for stem cell transplantation.
A total of 446 patients were randomized in a 3:2 ratio to receive either SARCLISA in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-VRd, 265 patients) or bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd, 181 patients) administered in both groups during 4 cycles of 42-day for the induction period. After completion of cycle 4, patients entered the continuous treatment period starting from cycle 5, 28-day cycles administered up to disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. During the continuous treatment period, patients of the Isa-VRd group received SARCLISA in combination with lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-Rd), and patients in the VRd group received lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Rd).
During the induction period (cycle 1 to 4, 42-day cycles), SARCLISA 10 mg/kg was administered as an I.V. infusion on day 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29, in the first cycle and on day 1, 15, and 29, from cycle 2 to 4. Bortezomib was administered subcutaneously at the dose of 1.3 mg/m² on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, and 32 of each cycle. Lenalidomide was administered per os at the dose of 25 mg/day from day 1 to 14 and from day 22 to 35 of each cycle. Dexamethasone (I.V. on the days of isatuximab infusions, and PO on the other days) 20 mg/day was given on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 15, 22, 23, 25, 26, 29, 30, 32, and 33 of each cycle. During the continuous treatment period (from cycle 5, 28-day cycles), SARCLISA 10 mg/kg was administered as an I.V. infusion on day 1 and 15 from cycle 5 to 17, and on day 1 from cycle 18. Lenalidomide was administered per os at the dose of 25 mg/day from day 1 to 21 of each cycle. Dexamethasone (I.V. on the days of isatuximab infusions, and PO on the other days) 20 mg/day was given on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of each cycle.
Overall, demographic and disease characteristics at baseline were similar between the two treatment groups. The median patient age was 72 years (range 60-80), 26% of patients were ≥75 years. ECOG
PS was 0 in 46.4% of patients in the Isa-VRd group and 43.6% in the VRd group, 1 in 42.3% in the Isa-VRd group and 45.9% in the VRd group, and 2 in 10.9% in the Isa-VRd group and 10.5% in the VRd group,and 3 in 0.4% in the Isa-VRd group and 0% in the VRd group. The proportion of patients with renal impairment (eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2) was 24.9% in the Isa-VRd group versus 34.3% in the VRd group. The Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage at study entry was I in 24.9%, II in 61.5%, and III in 10.2% of patients. Overall, 15.1% of patients had high-risk chromosomal abnormalities at study entry; del(17p), t(4;14), and t(14;16) were present in 5.7%, 7.9% and 1.9% of patients, respectively. In addition, 1q21+ was present in 35.8% of patients.
The median duration of treatment was 53.2 months for the Isa-VRd group compared to 31.3 months for the VRd group.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary efficacy endpoint of IMROZ. With a median follow-up time of 59.73 months, the pre-planned second interim analysis of PFS showed a statistically significant improvement in PFS representing a 40.4% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death in patients treated with Isa-VRd compared to patients treated with VRd.
Efficacy results are presented in Table 14 and Kaplan-Meier curves for PFS are provided in Figure 4:
Table 14* – Efficacy of SARCLISA in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in the treatment of multiple myeloma (intent-to-treat analysis)
a PFS results were assessed by an Independent Response Committee based on central laboratory data for M-protein and central radiologic imaging review using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria. b Stratified by age (<70 years vs ≥70 years) and Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) stage (I or II vs. III or not classified) according to IRT c sCR, CR, VGPR, and PR were evaluated by the IRC using the IMWG response criteria.
d Estimated using Clopper-Pearson method.
e Based on a sensitivity level of 10-5 by NGS in ITT population.
* Cut-off date of 26 September 2023. Median follow-up time=59.73 months.
NR: not reached
PFS improvement in the Isa-VRd group was confirmed by the sensitivity analyses and was observed across most subgroups of patients, including patients with 1q21+ chromosomal abnormality (HR=0.407; 95% CI: 0.253 to 0.653), ≥70 years (HR=0.671; 95% CI: 0.463 to 0.972), with baseline eGFR (MDRD) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (HR=0.63; 95% CI: 0.371 to 1.068), and with ECOG PS>1 (HR=0.606; 95% CI: (0.246 to 1.493).
NGS MRD negativity (10-5 sensitivity threshold) was reached in 58.1% of patients in the Isa-VRd group with a median time to first NGS MRD negativity of 196.5 days (range: 87-1834). In the VRd group, NGS MRD negativity (10-5 sensitivity threshold) was reached in 43.6% of patients with a median time to first NGS MRD negativity of 197.0 days (range: 107-1512). Sustained NGS MRD negativity rate for at least 12 months occurred in 46.8% of patients in the Isa-VRd group and in 24.3% in the VRd group. The median time to progression was not reached in the Isa-VRd group and was 59.70 months (95% CI: 48.164 to NR) in the VRd group (HR=0.414; 95% CI: 0.286 to 0.598). The median duration of response was not reached in the Isa-VRd group and was 58.25 months (95% CI: 44.583 to NR) in the VRd group. The median time to first response was 1.51 months in the Isa-VRd group and 1.48 months in the VRd group. The median time to next anti-myeloma treatment was not reached in the Isa-VRd group and 63.57 months in the VRd group (HR=0.376; 95% CI: 0.265 to 0.534). The median investigator-assessed PFS2 (time from randomization until disease progression after first subsequent anti-myeloma therapy or death) was not reached in either treatment group. The percentage of patients with disease progression after first subsequent anti-myeloma therapy or death was 31.7% in the Isa-VRd group and 41.4% in the VRd group, with an HR of 0.697 (95% CI: 0.51 to 0.952). Median overall survival was not reached for either treatment group. At a median follow-up time of 59.73 months, 26.0% of patients in the Isa-VRd group and 32.6% of patients in the VRd group had died (HR=0.776; 99.97% CI: 0.407 to 1.48). The 60-month survival rate estimates were respectively 72.3% in the Isa-VRd group and 66.3% in the VRd group.
Figure 4 – Kaplan-Meier Curves of PFS – ITT population – IMROZ (assessment by the IRC)
Cutoff date = 26-September-2023.
Overall, the quality of life assessed by Global Health Status Score (EQ-5D-5L) was maintained during the treatment period.
TCD13983
In a multicenter, open label, non-comparative dose escalation, 2-part, Phase Ib/II study (TCD13983), SARCLISA 10 mg/kg was administered intravenously in combination with 2 bortezomib-based regimens: cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (Isa-VCd) and lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (Isa-VRd) in adult patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) noneligible for transplantation (Isa-VCd and Isa-VRd Part A and B) or no intent for immediate transplantation (Isa-VRd Part B). In TCD13983, treatment regimen and schedule of administration, patient population and characteristics were similar to IMROZ. In TCD13983 Part A, 27 and 26 patients were evaluable for safety and efficacy, respectively, and 46 and 45 in Part B, respectively.
Isa-VRd efficacy and safety results from TCD13983 Part A and B are described below.
At a median follow-up time of 35.83 and 25.26 months respectively, the primary endpoint of CR and better (sCR/CR) rate was 50% and 60% in part A and part B respectively (response adjusted using isatuximab-specific IFE assay (Sebia Hydrashift), MRD negativity rate (10-5 sensitivity threshold) by combining NGF and NGS methods was 46.2% and 53.3% in part A and B, respectively. MRD negativity rate in adjusted sCR/CR patients (10-5 sensitivity threshold) by combining NGF and NGS methods was 30.8% and 44.4% in Part A and B, respectively. At a median follow up time of 37.90 and 26.18 months respectively, median PFS was not reached for both part A and B. The ORR was 100% and 97.8% in part A and B, respectively. At a median follow up time of 35.83 and 25.26 months respectively, the median time to first response was 1.41 months for both part A and B, and the median duration of response was not reached in both parts A and B. At a median follow-up time of 37.90 months and 26.18 months respectively, 3.7% and 8.7% of patients died in in part A and B, respectively.
Grade >3 TEAEs were reported in 88.9% of patients in part A and in 73.9% in part B, and serious TEAEs in 55.6% in part A and 52.2% in part B. Permanent discontinuation of treatment due to TEAEs was reported in 22.2% of patients in part A and in 17.4% in part B. The safety profile of Isa-VRd in part A and B of TCD13983 was manageable, with no new safety concerns identified compared to IMROZ (see section 4.8). TCD13983 Efficacy and safety results were consistent with IMROZ results.
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with SARCLISA in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in the treatment of malignant neoplasms of the haematopoietic and lymphoid tissue. See section 4.2 for information on paediatric use.

The pharmacokinetics of isatuximab were assessed in 476 patients with multiple myeloma treated with isatuximab intravenous infusion as a single agent or in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone, at doses ranging from 1 to 20 mg/kg, administered either once weekly; every 2 weeks; or every 2 weeks for 8 weeks followed by every 4 weeks; or every week for 4 weeks followed by every 2 weeks.
Isatuximab displays nonlinear pharmacokinetics with target-mediated drug disposition due to its binding to CD38 receptor.
Isatuximab exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval AUC) increases in a greater than dose proportional manner from 1 to 20 mg/kg following every 2 weeks schedule, while no deviation to the dose proportionality is observed between 5 and 20 mg/kg following every week for 4 weeks followed by every 2 weeks schedule. This is due to the high contribution of nonlinear target-mediated clearance to the total clearance at doses below 5 mg/kg, which becomes negligible at higher doses. After isatuximab 10 mg/kg administration every week for 4 weeks followed by every 2 weeks, the median time to reach steady state was 18 weeks with a 3.1-fold accumulation. In ICARIA-MM, clinical trial performed in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma patients treated with isatuximab in combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone, the mean (CV%) predicted maximum plasma concentration Cmax and AUC at steady state were 351 μg/mL (36.0%) and 72,600 μg.h/mL (51.7%), respectively. Although the change from a weight-based volume administration method for isatuximab infusion to the fixed volume infusion method resulted in changes in the tmax, the change had a limited impact on pharmacokinetics exposure with comparable simulated Cmax at steady state (283 μg/mL vs 284 μg/mL) and Ctrough at 4 weeks (119 μg/mL vs 119 μg/mL) for a patient with median weight (76 kg). Also for other patient weight groups, Cmax and Ctrough were comparable. In IKEMA, clinical trial performed in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma patients treated with isatuximab in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone, the mean (CV%) predicted maximum plasma concentration Cmax and AUC at steady state were 637 μg/mL (30.9%) and 152,000 μg.h/mL (37.8%), respectively. In IMROZ, clinical trial performed in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with isatuximab in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, the mean (CV%) predicted maximum plasma concentration Cmax and AUC2weeks at steady state were 494 μg/mL (25.5%) and 119,000 μg.h/mL (31.8%), respectively. Exposure parameters were consistent in IMROZ and TCD13983 studies.
The pharmacokinetics of isatuximab and pomalidomide, or of isatuximab and carfilzomib, or of isatuximab and bortezomib and lenalidomide were not influenced by their co-administration.
Distribution The estimated total volume of distribution of isatuximab is 8.75 L.
Metabolism As a large protein, isatuximab is expected to be metabolized by non-saturable proteolytic catabolism processes.
Elimination Isatuximab is eliminated by two parallel pathways, a nonlinear target-mediated pathway predominating at low concentrations, and a nonspecific linear pathway predominating at higher concentrations. In the therapeutic plasma concentrations range, the linear pathway is predominant and decreases over time by 50% to a steady state value of 9.55 mL/h (0.229 L/day). This is associated with a terminal half-life of 28 days.
Specific populations
Age The population pharmacokinetic analyses of 476 patients aged 36 to 85 years showed comparable exposure to isatuximab in patients <75 years old (n=406) versus ≥ 75 years old (n=70).
Gender
The population pharmacokinetic analysis with 207 female (43.5%) and 269 male (56.5%) patients showed no clinically meaningful effect of gender on isatuximab pharmacokinetics.
Race
The population pharmacokinetic analysis with 377 Caucasian (79%), 25 Asian (5%), 18 Black (4%), and 33 other race (7%) patients showed no clinically meaningful effect of race on isatuximab pharmacokinetics.
Weight Based on a population pharmacokinetics analysis using data from 476 patients, the clearance of isatuximab increased with increasing body weight, supporting the body-weight based dosing.
Hepatic Impairment
No formal studies of isatuximab in patients with hepatic impairment have been conducted. Out of the 476 patients of the population pharmacokinetic analyses, 65 patients presented with mild hepatic impairment [total bilirubin >1 to 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) or aspartate amino transferase (AST) > ULN] and 1 patient had moderate hepatic impairment (total bilirubin > 1.5 to 3 times ULN and any AST). Mild hepatic impairment had no clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of isatuximab. The effect of moderate (total bilirubin >1.5 times to 3 times ULN and any AST) and severe hepatic impairment (total bilirubin >3 times ULN and any AST) on isatuximab pharmacokinetics is unknown. However, since isatuximab is a monoclonal antibody, it is not expected to be cleared via hepatic-enzyme mediated metabolism and as such, variation in hepatic function is not expected to affect the elimination of isatuximab (see section 4.2).
Renal Impairment
No formal studies of isatuximab in patients with renal impairment have been conducted. The population pharmacokinetic analyses on 476 patients included 192 patients with mild renal impairment (60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ≤ estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) <90 mL/min/1.73 m2), 163 patients with moderate renal impairment (30 mL/min/1.73 m2≤ e-GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and 12 patients with severe renal impairment (e-GFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2). Analyses suggested no clinically meaningful effect of mild to severe renal impairment on isatuximab pharmacokinetics compared to normal renal function.
A Pharmacokinetics analysis on 22 patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) including patients on dialysis (eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m²) showed no clinically meaningful effects of ESRD on isatuximab pharmacokinetics compared to those of normal, mild, or moderate renal function.
Paediatric population
Isatuximab was not evaluated in patients under 18 years of age.

Non-clinical data reveal no special hazard for humans based on conventional studies of repeated dose toxicity, albeit the species selected is not pharmacologically responsive and therefore the relevance for humans is not known. Genotoxicity, carcinogenic potential and toxicity to reproduction and development studies have not been performed.

Sucrose
Histidine hydrochloride monohydrate
Histidine
Polysorbate 80
Water for injections

This medicinal product must not be mixed with other medicinal products except those mentioned in section 6.6.

Unopened Vial 3 years After dilution Chemical and physical in-use stability of SARCLISA infusion solution has been demonstrated for 48 hours at 2°C - 8°C, followed by 8 hours (including the infusion time) at room temperature (15°C - 25°C). From a microbiological point of view, the product should be used immediately. If not used immediately, in-use storage times and conditions prior use are the responsibility of the user and would normally not be longer than 24 hours at 2°C to 8°C, unless dilution has taken place in controlled and validated aseptic conditions. No protection from light is required for storage in the infusion bag.

Store in a refrigerator (2°C - 8°C).
Do not freeze.
Store in the original package in order to protect from light.
For storage conditions after dilution of the medicinal product, see section 6.3.

5 ml concentrate containing 100 mg of isatuximab in a 6 mL type I colourless clear glass vial closed with ETFE (copolymer of ethylene and tetrafluoroethylene)-coated bromobutyl stopper. The vials are crimped with an aluminium seal with a grey flip-off button. The fill volume has been established to ensure removal of 5 mL (i.e. 5.4 mL). Pack size of one or three vials.
25 ml concentrate containing 500 mg of isatuximab in a 30 mL type I colourless clear glass vial closed with ETFE (copolymer of ethylene and tetrafluoroethylene)-coated bromobutyl stopper. The vials are crimped with an aluminium seal with a blue flip-off button. The fill volume has been established to ensure removal of 25 mL (i.e. 26 mL). Pack size of one vial.
Not all pack sizes may be marketed.

Preparation for the intravenous administration
The preparation of the infusion solution must be done under aseptic conditions.
• The dose (mg) of SARCLISA concentrate should be calculated based on patient weight (measured prior to each cycle to have the administered dose adjusted accordingly, see section 4.2). More than one vial may be necessary to obtain the required dose for the patient.
• Vials of SARCLISA concentrate should be visually inspected before dilution to ensure they do not contain any particles and are not discoloured.
• Do not shake vials.
• The volume of diluent equal to the required volume of SARCLISA concentrate should be removed from a 250 mL sodium chloride 9 mg/mL (0.9%) solution for injection or glucose 5% solution diluent bag.
• The appropriate volume of SARCLISA concentrate should be withdrawn from the SARCLISA vial and diluted in the 250 mL infusion bag with sodium chloride 9 mg/mL (0.9%) solution for injection or glucose 5% solution.
• The infusion bag must be made of polyolefins (PO), polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) with di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) or ethyl vinyl acetate (EVA).
• Gently homogenize the diluted solution by inverting the bag. Do not shake.
Administration
• The infusion solution must be administered by intravenous infusion using an intravenous tubing infusion set (in PE, PVC with or without DEHP, polybutadiene (PBD) or polyurethane (PU)) with a 0.22 micron in-line filter (polyethersulfone (PES), polysulfone or nylon).
• The infusion solution should be administered for a period of time that will depend on the infusion rate (see section 4.2).
• No protection from light is required for the prepared infusion bag in a standard artificial light environment.
• Do not infuse SARCLISA solution concomitantly in the same intravenous line with other agents.
Disposal Any unused medicinal product or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements.